Back to Blog
Cold Calling5 min read

Who Actually Answers a Cold Call, According to the Data

Somewhere between 87% and 92% of people don't answer calls from numbers they don't recognize. That number gets repeated constantly, and it's accurate. It's also mostly beside the point for B2B outbound, because it describes how the general public behaves, not how someone whose job includes evaluating vendors actually acts. The better question is whether that same screening instinct holds up once the person on the other end has a real professional reason to care who's calling, and the data on that question is more interesting than the headline stat suggests.

Seniority Looks Contradictory Until You Split Two Different Questions

RAIN Group's prospecting research puts phone preference at 57% among C-level and VP buyers, 51% among directors, and 47% among managers. Preference rises with seniority, which already cuts against the usual assumption that busier, more senior people are harder to reach.

There's a second number that seems to argue the opposite: a widely cited claim that 90% of CEOs never respond to cold outreach. Separate research notes the average CEO fields over 200 outbound sales calls a month. Both can be true, because they're measuring different things. A preference survey asks which channel someone would rather use once a vendor has their attention. It says nothing about whether that person picks up an unrecognized number on a random Tuesday afternoon. Preference climbs with seniority. Reachability drops, because the gatekeeping around a senior buyer thickens faster than their stated preference rises. That's likely where a lot of the conflicting advice on hierarchy actually comes from: people quoting one number and people quoting the other, both correct, both describing only half the picture.

Department Shifts the Baseline Too

Function matters on its own, apart from seniority. One analysis found technology buyers preferring phone at 54%, professional services buyers at 50%, and financial services buyers at 40%. A director in IT and a director in finance start from different places before anyone dials, regardless of how senior either one is.

There's a reasonable case that selling into sales itself sits at the favorable end of this spectrum, even without a specific number to point to. A sales leader or RevOps buyer has spent their career on the other side of a cold call. They understand the motion, they're less likely to treat an unsolicited call as an intrusion on principle, and in some cases they'll actually respect the effort of the outreach itself. That's a different dynamic than calling into IT, where the buyer's daily work rarely involves being the one making the ask, and the instinct to screen unfamiliar contact tends to run stronger.

The People Most Teams Skip

Sales teams tend to dial the title that sounds important and pass over the person who's actually easiest to reach. Orum's own call data found administrative staff and executive assistants connecting at 6% to 7.8%, among the highest rates of any title tier, while receiving less than 1% of total dial volume. IT leadership direct lines, by contrast, get heavily over-dialed while connecting at only 2.6% to 2.7%.

There's a related and often overlooked category worth naming here too. In MEDDIC and similar sales methodologies, a "coach" is someone inside the target account who isn't the decision-maker and doesn't have the authority to approve anything, but who has real standing with the people who do, and is willing to share what's actually happening inside the account or make an introduction that a cold dial never could. Research on enterprise buying puts a large share of the actual purchasing conversation, often cited around 80%, happening in internal discussions the seller is never part of. A coach is one of the only ways to get any visibility into that room at all. Buyers at every level are fielding more outreach than they used to, which makes a warm path through someone they already trust more valuable now than it's ever been, not less. Finding that person is frequently a better use of a rep's time than another cold attempt at the named target directly.

There's a Machine in the Mix Now Too

Apple's iOS 26 added an opt-in call screening feature. Once turned on, an unrecognized number gets auto-answered by the phone itself, the caller is asked to say who they are and why they're calling, and the person sees a transcript before it actually rings on their end. Estimated adoption among US B2B decision-makers sits around 40% to 50%, and iPhones make up most of the US smartphone market, so this isn't a fringe concern.

The honest read here is that this is good news for a rep doing real work. The feature exists because the channel got flooded with low-effort, high-volume dialing, predictive dialers blasting thousands of numbers with no one ready to speak the moment a line connects, generic scripts that could be aimed at anyone. That's exactly the kind of outreach a screening layer is built to catch and quietly remove from the pool. A rep who's done the research and has a specific, clear reason for calling this person right now isn't competing with the flood anymore once that flood gets filtered out before it ever rings. Less noise in the channel means a well-prepared call has more room to actually land.

What This Adds Up to on an Actual Call

None of this means outbound is under siege. A rep knows exactly who they dialed. What they don't know until the call connects is who's actually on the line, the named target, an assistant, a coach who's willing to help route them further in, or a screening system evaluating the first few words before a human hears anything at all. That uncertainty is just part of the job, and it's the same whether the rep has a planned opener ready or is working entirely off instinct, which is how most cold calls actually happen anyway.

The useful part is that a wary VP, a protective assistant, a coach deciding whether to vouch for a rep, and an AI screening system are all filtering for roughly the same thing: something clear, something specific, a real reason for this call to this person right now. Getting that right doesn't require guessing correctly in advance about who's going to pick up. It requires being sharp enough, in whatever moment actually happens, to make the connection count.

That's the part COSaiL is built for. It listens to what's actually being said and surfaces something worth saying back to whoever, or whatever, is actually on the line, without requiring the rep to have predicted that situation ahead of time. Fewer low-effort calls are making it through than they used to. That's a real advantage for the reps and teams who show up with something worth saying once they do.

Who Actually Answers a Cold Call, According to the Data | COSaiL